Define the accepted pack
State what passes for fill, seal, code, appearance and inspection before asking for speed.
Packaging systems configured around your application Defined project scope
Turn your product, package, output and acceptance requirements into a supplier-ready request for quotation. Generate the brief in your browser, copy it, and send the same basis to every supplier.
Your entries stay in this browser. This tool does not submit or store the form data.
Required fields are marked with an asterisk. Add what is known now; the generated brief keeps open items visible instead of hiding them behind a generic machine model.
A useful packaging-machine RFQ defines the product, finished package, accepted output, line boundary and test evidence. A machine name and headline speed are not enough to compare quotations.
Two quotations may list similar machines while assigning different fillers, inspection equipment, interfaces, test materials, documentation and service responsibilities. The generated brief keeps those boundaries visible so suppliers can state their proposed solution and exceptions against one common basis.
State what passes for fill, seal, code, appearance and inspection before asking for speed.
Include the widest format, most difficult product, cleaning boundary and real site constraints.
Make the critical requirement traceable to product, material, duration, measurement and evidence.
Keep each supplier’s exceptions beside the same requirement. Do not merge an unconfirmed statement into the accepted scope.
| Comparison field | What the buyer should define | What the supplier should return |
|---|---|---|
| Production basis | Product, dose, package, format list and operating condition. | Proposed machine, filler, options and explicit applicability. |
| Accepted output | Good packs over an agreed run, including quality and reject rules. | Expected output basis, dependencies, limitations and FAT method. |
| Line boundary | Upstream, inspection, transfer, secondary pack, controls and utilities. | Included equipment, interface ownership, exclusions and required third parties. |
| Evidence | Samples, measurements, records, witnesses and retained deliverables. | Test plan, data format, sample needs, deviation and retest process. |
| Commercial scope | Destination, installation, training, documentation, spares and timing. | Dated quotation, Incoterm, payment basis, lead-time basis and support scope. |
The builder defines the comparison basis. These pages help resolve the machine route, system interfaces and acceptance evidence.
Compare roll-stock doypack, sachet and supplied premade-pouch architectures before fixing a model.
Compare pouch packing machines →Connect product behaviour, dosing, pouch support and seal-area control.
Review filling-system selection →Assign product, controls, safety, quality, utility and data interfaces.
Use the integration checklist →Turn the critical requirements into observable checks and retained evidence.
Review the FAT checklist →Define primary packing, inspection, conveying and secondary packaging as one project.
Review turnkey solutions →Send the generated brief with product and package samples for a configuration review.
Contact INMAYPACK →Destination-market requirements must be confirmed for the delivered configuration. General references such as ISO 12100, the current EU machinery rules, or applicable U.S. machine-guarding requirements do not replace a project-specific legal and risk assessment.
At minimum, define the actual product, fill range, package format and dimensions, target accepted output, destination market and the method that will determine whether a finished pack passes. Add utilities, interfaces, cleaning, changeover, documentation and service scope as the project develops.
Only when the machine architecture is already fixed for a valid reason. Otherwise define the production outcome and constraints, then require each supplier to identify the proposed model, configuration, options, assumptions and exceptions.
Cycle speed describes machine motion under a stated condition. Accepted output counts finished packs that meet the agreed product, fill, seal, code, appearance and inspection criteria over the defined run. The RFQ should use accepted output for comparison.
Name the product and packaging samples, formats, run duration, planned stops, measurements, reject rules, records, retained samples, pass criteria and the method for closing deviations. The final FAT protocol should trace the critical RFQ requirements to observable evidence.
No. The form runs locally in the browser. It generates text only after you press the button. Data leaves the page only if you choose an email, contact or messaging action and submit it yourself.
Yes. That is the main purpose of the tool. Send the same controlled requirements to each supplier, then compare their proposed configuration, exceptions, test basis, included scope and commercial terms against that common document.
Share the generated RFQ with product and package samples. INMAYPACK can review the machine route, filling interface, line boundary and evidence needed before a project configuration is confirmed.