Packaging systems configured around your application Defined project scope
Mayonnaise pouch packaging
Compare premade side-spout pouches, roll-film doypacks and flat sachets around the actual mayonnaise formulation, temperature, package drawing, filling route, cleaning boundary and accepted-output test.
Direct answer
A mayonnaise packaging machine is a project-matched filling and closing system, not one universal model. It presents or forms the package, meters the validated product, protects the seal or spout area, closes the pack and discharges finished units for the agreed inspection.
The correct route changes with the formulation, product temperature, particle content, package geometry, fill range, cleaning method and required accepted output. A pump that handles one smooth mayonnaise cannot be assumed to suit every aerated, hot-filled or inclusion-containing recipe.
INMAYPACK therefore reviews the product and package together before selecting a sauce packaging machine system or a specific pouch platform.
Package-first selection
Fix the approved package and product-supply route before comparing model names. Each route creates a different filling, sealing, cleaning and acceptance task.
The documented SG260 reference receives compatible finished pouches and combines opening, metered filling, top sealing, spout insertion and cap handling. The retained source configuration identifies mayonnaise among representative smooth food products, subject to validation.
Review the SG260 reference →
This route forms the stand-up pouch from approved roll stock before filling and sealing. Film structure, gusset formation, nozzle access, product settling and seal-area protection must be proven with the intended mayonnaise and pack drawing.
Compare the liquid doypack route →
Flat roll-film sachets can be evaluated for suitable portion packs. The pump, nozzle cutoff, sachet opening, fill time, seal contamination control and laminate window must be matched to the real product rather than inferred from a nominal dose.
Review the liquid sachet platform →Product definition
“Mayonnaise” is not enough information for machine selection. Provide the production condition that the filling system must repeatedly handle.
State the lowest, nominal and highest filling temperature plus any hold time. Record how product consistency changes across the intended operating window.
Identify herbs, vegetable pieces or other inclusions with their maximum size and concentration. A smooth-product pump reference does not establish compatibility with particulates.
Explain whether texture is sensitive to recirculation or shear and whether entrained air affects dosing. Nozzle closing behavior must limit strings, drips and seal-area contamination.
Define product-contact materials, cleaning method, utilities, disassembly boundary, drainability expectations and the evidence required before production release.
Filling architecture
The filler cannot be selected from a catalogue viscosity value alone. The upstream vessel, hose length, pump cycle, nozzle geometry, filling height and package motion all affect the result at the sealing station.
The retained SG260 source quotation documents a two-servo-rotor-pump route with a 100 L vertical tank and 316L product-contact parts for that quoted configuration. It also gives a source reference up to 5,000 cP for compatible liquids and pastes without solid particles. These are project references, not universal mayonnaise limits.
Other products or package routes may require a different pump, tank, agitation, heating, nozzle or cleaning arrangement. Submit a representative sample and the approved package before the filling architecture is fixed.
Use the pouch filling-system selection guide →
Commercial comparison
Issue the same controlled requirement to every supplier. A lower machine total is not comparable when the pump, tank, spout handling, cleaning, inspection or trial materials differ.
| Decision area | What to define | What the proposal should state |
|---|---|---|
| Product supply | Batch or continuous feed, temperature, refill method, pressure and buffer capacity | Tank, pump, piping, level control, recirculation and upstream interface boundary |
| Filling | Minimum/nominal/maximum fill, tolerance method, inclusions, aeration and cutoff behavior | Metering principle, number of fillers, nozzle arrangement, controls and test method |
| Package | Controlled drawing, laminate, spout/cap data, artwork and physical samples | Format range, change parts, forming or pouch-feed route, sealing and cooling stations |
| Cleaning | Allergens, changeover sequence, utilities, disassembly and release evidence | Product-contact materials, cleaning boundary, access, drainability and included hardware |
| Accepted output | Conforming packs per minute, run duration, reject rules and planned interruptions | Test condition, responsibilities, acceptance calculations and retained records |
| Downstream scope | Coding, inspection, rejection, accumulation, cartoning and line signals | Included devices, interface list, ownership boundaries and final line layout |
Selection risks
Most quotation gaps begin before the machine is built. Remove the ambiguity from the product, package and acceptance method while changes are still inexpensive.
A product name does not define pump duty. The supplier needs the production recipe boundary, filling temperature, consistency range, aeration, inclusions and supply pressure. If these change by SKU, list the full range and identify the most difficult condition instead of sending only the easiest sample.
A finished sample cannot reliably define seal width, spout location, cap geometry, material structure, tolerance, artwork position or supplier revision. Send a dimensioned drawing and production-quality components. Record which converter and material lot will be used during the FAT.
One quotation may include the product tank, pump, hoses, nozzles, cleaning hardware, spout feeder and inspection while another excludes them. Normalize every proposal against the same requirement matrix. The useful commercial comparison is total included responsibility, not the base-frame line item.
Machine cycles do not deduct unfilled pouches, contaminated seals, rejected caps, startup waste or stoppages. Define accepted packs per minute over an agreed run, with reject causes and planned interruptions recorded. Use the same calculation during quotation review and FAT.
Cleaning affects tank access, pump construction, hose routing, valves, drains, utilities, controls, changeover time and release evidence. State whether the project uses manual cleaning, assisted cleaning or a defined CIP route, and identify what remains the buyer’s responsibility. A general “easy to clean” claim is not an acceptance method.
Line responsibility
A reliable mayonnaise line is more than a pouch machine. Product delivery must keep the filler supplied without introducing unacceptable temperature drift or aeration. Package materials must arrive in the orientation and condition required by the forming or feeding system. Finished packs need a controlled route to coding, inspection, rejection and secondary packaging.
Write the ownership boundary for each interface before the order. If the buyer supplies a kitchen vessel or transfer pump, identify the connection, pressure, flow, cleaning state and low-product response. If the packaging supplier includes a tank, confirm replenishment, level control, agitation or temperature control where required, plus access for operation and maintenance.
Downstream equipment must receive a stable product flow. Define the discharge height and direction, minimum accumulation, good-pack signal, reject confirmation, emergency-stop chain and restart sequence. A fast filler that is repeatedly blocked by inspection or cartoning does not produce a fast accepted line.
For a complete primary-to-secondary scope, compare the turnkey packaging line responsibility model before fixing the individual machine contract.
Factory acceptance
Useful output is accepted finished packs under one named product and package condition. The FAT should record both conforming output and the reasons for every rejected pack.
For a broader line view, use the packaging system integration checklist to define signals, stops, accumulation and downstream ownership.
Agree the handover evidence before the trial starts. The final record should identify the recipe or settings used, test materials and lot references, measuring equipment, sample frequency, observed stops, adjustments, reject disposition and the people who witnessed acceptance. Photographs and retained packs are useful only when they are tied to the same controlled test record. If a result is conditional or a corrective action remains open, state the owner and closure method instead of treating the FAT signature as an unconditional production guarantee.
RFQ preparation
Related machine paths
Buyer questions
There is no universal best format. Portion sachets, roll-film doypacks and premade spout pouches solve different serving, shelf, filling and closure tasks. Confirm the accepted package first, then select the machine route that can repeatedly fill and close it with the intended product.
Possibly, but only after both products, all required fill ranges, cleaning/changeover rules and packages are reviewed. A pump and nozzle selected for one smooth sauce may not suit a thicker, aerated or inclusion-containing product without changes.
The retained SG260 source quotation lists mayonnaise among representative compatible food products for its quoted smooth liquid/paste route. That does not confirm every formulation. The real product, pouch, spout, cap and cleaning method must still be validated together.
Filling height, nozzle entry and withdrawal, cutoff behavior, pouch support, fill amount, product settling and machine timing all contribute. The trial should record contaminated seals as rejects and verify the agreed inspection method.
Do not assume it is. The documented SG260 pump and tank are described as compatible with a CIP-configured route, but the cleaning circuit, utilities, recipes, drainability, valves, verification and supply boundary must be written into the project scope.
Accepted output depends on product supply, pump cycle, fill amount, pouch handling, filling access, seal or cap time, inspection, rejects and downstream flow. A supplier speed reference becomes meaningful only when the product, package and FAT method are named.
Provide representative product, production-quality pouches or film, spouts and caps where used, plus controlled drawings and material specifications. Confirm the trial quantity with the supplier after the test duration and changeover plan are agreed.
It should identify the filler, product supply, package handling, contact materials, cleaning boundary, change parts, coding and inspection, utilities, line interfaces, FAT, documents, spares, delivery and site-service responsibilities. Compare quotations against the same RFQ revision.
Application review
Send your mayonnaise condition, fill range, package drawing and samples, cleaning requirements, target accepted output and FAT priorities. INMAYPACK will review the application boundary and identify the machine and filling inputs still required.